---

Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management

---

The two-way trading in the foreign exchange market is packaged as a shortcut to upward mobility with "zero barriers to entry, high ceilings, and no social interaction required." The essence of this rhetoric is a precise hunt for human nature.

---

It first breaks down rational defenses with a narrative of instant wealth, then lures traders into surrendering their principal with the illusion of being "chosen ones." The hunt is complete when the account balance reaches zero. While some do profit in the market, treating individual cases as patterns is mistaking survivorship bias for a systemic flaw—profitability is a fact, your ability to profit is an illusion; between the two lies an abyss dug by probability, cost, and rules.
The rules of the game are written the moment an account is opened: exchanges, liquidity providers, and brokers constitute the largest counterparty "outside the market." They not only gamble against you, but also convert the trader's principal into their own risk-free profits by taking a commission on every trade, charging interest on every leverage, and charging interest on every overnight position. T+0, high leverage, two-way trading, and daily settlement with no outstanding debt seem to offer freedom, but in reality, they quantify human weaknesses into transaction fees: short-sightedness fuels high-frequency trading, greed amplifies leverage, and fear triggers chasing highs and lows. All emotions ultimately crystallize into spreads, commissions, financing interest, and slippage, passing up layer by layer to the rule-makers. Technical analysis, signal groups, and copy trading communities are merely tools to prolong the "half-life of illusion," causing traders to repeatedly deposit funds in a cycle of "almost making a profit" until their principal is exhausted.
An even more insidious slaughterhouse lies in the liquidity food chain. Institutional investors enjoy exchange rebates, internal matching, dedicated hosting, and risk control liquidation, while retail investors bear the full spread, network latency, and retaliatory orders triggered by emotional outbursts. In terms of information, institutions possess order flow, seat holdings, and satellite thermal imaging data, while retail investors can only glean secondhand information. In terms of funding, institutional investors have their risk control department enforce stop-loss orders when liquidated, while retail investors' liquidations are often accompanied by calls for margin calls. For the same instrument and the same market conditions, different seats see completely different order depths, slippage distributions, and order priorities. The so-called "fairness and openness" only applies to the same level; crossing levels results in a devastating blow. The role of retail investors is predetermined from the moment they enter the market: providing liquidity, absorbing risk, contributing transaction fees, and statistically completing a one-way transfer of wealth.
If you still insist on "I can be an exception," please answer three questions first: Can you quantify leverage, spreads, commissions, slippage, overnight interest, and funding rates into the expected value of your strategy? Can you lock the maximum drawdown within 5% of your principal in two hundred consecutive trades? Can the emotional curve from opening to closing a position be stretched into a straight line without fluctuation? If the answer to either is no, then losing your account to zero is not a risk, but a function of time. The market doesn't need to beat you; it simply needs to wait for you to complete your self-liquidation on your self-designed path of heavy leverage, high frequency, and emotional trading.

In the two-way game of the forex market, waiting is not a polite way of "waiting for someone," but rather the only moat protecting your capital between time and volatility.

---

Most losers don't fail to understand the direction, but rather cannot tolerate the chaotic disturbances before the direction materializes. They misinterpret "immediate execution" as "taking control," so they rush to open and close positions, only to contradict themselves when the price slightly reverses, resulting in an empty account when the trend resumes.
Pending order trading transforms "forced market monitoring" into "pre-placed orders," essentially replacing amygdala impulses with systematic discipline: placing a limit buy order at a key price level is like writing the opening conditions into a contract that only the market can sign; until the price is reached, emotions are locked in the cloud. Setting a profit-taking limit price within the target range moves the decision to close profits from the burning fingertips to the calm of the morning.
More granularly, breaking down the total position into a dozen or so lightweight pending orders allows price differences and time to automatically complete position building and reduction. Unrealized losses no longer bombard the mental account, and the margin curve rises gradually like a staircase, allowing traders to sleep peacefully even during overnight gaps or data releases.
When pending order logic is repeatedly backtested and parameters are calibrated to the minute level, waiting is no longer agonizing but becomes the strategy itself. Those skilled in pending orders convert emotions into statistical values ​​of slippage and spreads, rewriting "when should I enter the market?" as "when will the market give me the opportunity?" Thus, time and volatility begin to pay interest for them. This is the simplest and most reliable formula for victory in the forex market.

In the business logic of forex banks, large sums of money are never "unwelcome," but rather must be examined under a brighter spotlight.

---

Whether the remitting bank is a well-known global systemically important bank or a rural credit cooperative in a remote area, as long as a single transaction triggers an internal threshold, proof of the source of funds automatically becomes an unavoidable step. Behind this seemingly mechanical requirement lies the fundamental compliance red line of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing. National regulatory frameworks have enshrined "customer due diligence" in law, not just self-regulatory rules. Large transactions, due to their size and speed, are naturally prone to being broken down into complex, multi-layered, cross-border, and cross-currency chains, becoming ideal channels for concealing upstream criminal proceeds. Drug trafficking, smuggling, fraud, and ransomware payments may first flow into a sub-account of a "top ten" bank's customer, and then be transferred to a foreign exchange bank via a SWIFT instruction. If the latter fails to retain complete and auditable records of the source of funds, regulatory agencies can directly impose administrative fines equivalent to a percentage of the transaction amount based on "dereliction of duty," and in serious cases, even suspend their foreign exchange business license. For single-license foreign exchange banks with weak capital bases, a single fine can wipe out an entire year's profits; therefore, they choose to bring compliance costs forward—requiring customers to provide proof, rather than explaining to regulators afterward.
Secondly, foreign exchange banks typically have much smaller balance sheets than large international banks, making them less resilient to liquidity fluctuations and reputational risks. A sudden nine-figure USD deposit, if subsequently linked to cross-border gambling or individuals on sanctions lists by judicial authorities, could be frozen within hours. The bank would not only lose the deposit but also immediately need to adjust reserves, re-match forward positions, and face negative scrutiny from the media and rating agencies. Pre-screening the source of funds is equivalent to adding a "legal quality" filter to the liabilities side, keeping high-risk funds that could trigger legal proceedings or regulatory investigations out of the books, thus protecting the smooth operation of daily operations.
Thirdly, the tiered limit system is an automatic trigger within the bank that distinguishes between "regular" and "exceptional" transactions. Within the quarterly limit, the system can credit the funds after comparing them against the anti-money laundering list according to preset parameters; once the limit is exceeded, the algorithm automatically upgrades the review process, requiring supplementary documentation of the source of funds. This mechanism is not a "barrier," but rather provides a traceable and auditable "legal coordinate" for transactions. Funds with impeccable legality, such as inheritance, real estate sales, merger and acquisition payments, and private equity exit proceeds, can be quickly deposited once all necessary documents are complete. Conversely, if the funds are linked to fraudulent activities or money laundering schemes, the evidence chain will inevitably break, allowing banks to terminate operations before the funds are actually transferred, thus preventing subsequent civil lawsuits from victims or regulatory orders for compensation.
Finally, standardized procedures are designed to prevent "reputable banks" from becoming loopholes in the regulations. In international wire transfers, funds can pass through multiple correspondent banks, and the final "remittance bank" displayed may not be the originating bank. If foreign exchange banks automatically lower their scrutiny based on the remittance bank's ranking, money laundering groups can use methods such as purchasing letters of credit, interbank lending, and secondary market forfaiting to "launder" illicit funds into mainstream banks before transferring them to foreign exchange banks. Applying the same large-amount due diligence standard to all clients avoids moral hazard and reduces the discretionary space of front-office staff, ensuring the due diligence process is not influenced by "brand halo" and thus maintaining a neutral, stable, and auditable risk appetite.

The real reason why Japanese forex brokers and banks offer carry trades on currency pairs such as TRY/JPY.

---

In the context of two-way foreign exchange investment and trading, Japanese forex brokers and banks, unlike their Hong Kong counterparts, typically include currency pairs such as TRY/JPY (Turkish Lira to Japanese Yen), ZAR/JPY (South African Rand to Japanese Yen), and MXN/JPY (Mexican Peso to Japanese Yen) in their carry trade portfolios. This choice is not accidental, but rather driven by a combination of factors, including the yen's core market position, strong domestic investment demand in Japan, a mature and comprehensive trading system, a well-adapted regulatory model, long-standing market traditions, and national strategic planning. These factors form a mutually supportive and synergistic business ecosystem.
The yen's long-standing low-interest-rate nature fundamentally aligns with the core logic of carry trades, serving as the underlying foundation for Japanese financial institutions' related business. The core operating model of carry trades involves borrowing low-interest currencies and then exchanging them for high-interest currencies to invest and profit from the interest rate differential. Since the bursting of the domestic asset bubble in the 1990s, the Japanese yen has experienced a sustained decline in interest rates, not only remaining near zero for a long period but also entering negative territory multiple times. This interest rate pattern has made the yen a core funding currency for global carry trades. In stark contrast, the issuing countries of the Turkish lira, South African rand, and Mexican peso often maintain relatively high benchmark interest rates due to domestic high inflation and economic volatility, creating a significant and sustainable interest rate differential with the yen. This naturally makes currency pairs such as TRY/JPY and ZAR/JPY valuable for carry trades. Japanese banks and brokers offer these types of trading instruments, which not only meet the core demand of global carry trades for low-interest-rate financing currencies but also provide stable returns through trading commissions and spreads. This makes them a crucial hub for cross-border carry trades. For example, international investors can easily borrow low-interest yen from Japanese financial institutions and then exchange it for currencies like the lira or rand to invest in assets in corresponding countries to profit from interest rate differentials. Japanese institutions, in turn, realize their business gains in this process.
Strong, multi-layered investment demand within Japan provides solid market support for these niche currency carry trades. From the perspective of individual investors, groups like "Mrs. Watanabe," who were drawn to low yen deposit rates in earlier years, began to participate in cross-border carry trades through foreign exchange margin trading and purchasing foreign currency retail bonds to pursue returns far exceeding those of domestic deposits. The high-interest characteristics of currencies like TRY, ZAR, and MXN are highly attractive to these return-seeking individual investors, thus generating a sustained and stable demand for these currency pairs. From the perspective of institutional investors, large Japanese institutions such as pension funds and insurance funds have seen a significant decline in the exchange rate hedging ratio of their overseas investments in recent years. In 2023, the exchange rate hedging ratio of major Japanese life insurance companies' overseas investments had fallen to 46%. To further improve the overall return of their investment portfolios, these institutions are willing to moderately bear some exchange rate volatility risk and actively allocate carry trades, including high-yield currency pairs such as TRY/JPY. The sheer size of institutional funds not only absorbs the supply of these products but also further drives Japanese financial institutions to deploy these types of trades.
Japan's mature and leading foreign exchange trading system provides ample operational capacity for conducting carry trades on these niche currency pairs. As the world's fifth-largest international financial center, Japan boasts the world's largest foreign exchange margin market, with its retail foreign exchange trading volume consistently accounting for 35% to 40% of the global market share. It possesses extremely well-developed financial market infrastructure, top-tier global liquidity of yen assets, and excellent liquidity in forward swap transactions between the yen and various currencies, fully meeting the core need for locking in exchange rate risk in carry trades. Meanwhile, Japanese banks and brokers have accumulated decades of mature experience in the foreign exchange trading field. They possess channels and resources to connect with liquidity providers for niche currencies such as TRY, ZAR, and MXN. They can also efficiently build dedicated trading systems and complete related clearing and settlement operations based on existing systems, without incurring excessively high basic operating costs for these types of instruments. Their professional business capabilities are sufficient to support the smooth operation of carry trades for currency pairs such as TRY/JPY.
The Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA)'s highly adaptable regulatory model provides compliant development space for these high-risk carry trades. Unlike Hong Kong's regulatory approach, which focuses on restricting high-risk instruments, the Japanese FSA implements a mixed regulatory framework. Its core focus in regulating foreign exchange margin trading is to standardize trading processes and protect investor funds, rather than directly restricting trading in niche high-risk currency pairs. Although it also sets a maximum leverage limit of 1:25 for retail foreign exchange and requires segregated custody of customer funds, these rules are all for maintaining trading fairness and do not create barriers to the supply of instruments such as TRY/JPY. Meanwhile, regulators require brokers to regularly submit reports on core data such as their equity ratio and trading risk exposure. This aims to guide the market through improved information disclosure and risk management mechanisms, rather than excluding currencies like TRY and ZAR. Under this regulatory model, Japanese financial institutions only need to follow a unified compliance framework to conduct carry trades on relevant currency pairs without incurring additional special regulatory adaptation costs.
Carry trade is both a long-standing tradition in the Japanese financial market and an important strategic choice to support the country's overseas investment strategy. Yen carry trade has been deeply integrated into the development of the Japanese financial market, from early days when foreign banks' branches in Japan borrowed yen and allocated it for overseas lending, to later widespread participation from household investors and professional institutions This has created a multi-layered, full-chain market ecosystem. These transactions not only allow banks and brokers to directly profit through commissions and spreads, but also drive Japanese domestic funds into the global market, gradually forming a massive net foreign asset base. Data shows that between 1994 and 2023, Japan's net international savings accumulation increased sevenfold, and the interest rate spread between its assets and liabilities continued to widen. Therefore, it is evident that Japanese financial institutions offering carry trade instruments such as TRY/JPY are essentially continuing their long-standing tradition of carry trade, and also serving as a crucial strategic means to support domestic funds in achieving global asset allocation and obtaining international investment returns.

In Hong Kong's over-the-counter leveraged foreign exchange market, the reason why TRY/JPY, ZAR/JPY, and MXN/JPY have consistently been absent from the "Carry Trade" section is not due to a lack of technical capabilities on the part of the platforms, but rather because the four curves of risk, regulation, cost, and customer base are all converging downwards, pushing commercial viability to a negative value.

---

First, let's look at the risks: The core of carry trades is to allow investors to earn overnight interest rate spreads while keeping exchange rate fluctuations within a range that the spread can cover. However, the overnight implied volatility of the Turkish lira, South African rand, and Mexican peso has long been above 25%, three times that of G7 currencies, meaning that annualized volatility is enough to wipe out 800-1000 basis points of interest rate spread surplus. Even more dangerous is the inherent instability of the interest rate spread itself—in March 2024, the Turkish central bank suddenly raised its benchmark interest rate from 17% to 35% overnight, causing the lira to depreciate by 12% in a single day. On the same day, the yen surged by 4% due to the BOJ's unexpected cancellation of YCC. Long positions in the TRY/JPY carry trade wiped out three years' worth of accumulated interest rate spreads within 14 hours. Hong Kong licensed brokers were forced to liquidate at a uniform 50% margin level due to the 20:1 leverage limit, resulting in a slippage of 2.3 standard deviations. Clients' outstanding debts accounted for 18% of the month's net profit, and the board of directors directly halted all high-interest emerging market cross-currency projects.
From a regulatory perspective, while the SFC has not explicitly banned TRY, ZAR, and MXN, the "Over-the-Counter Leveraged Foreign Exchange Circular" includes "non-specified currencies" in an additional 30% risk weighting and mandates daily reporting to the central government of four-dimensional data: nominal value, Delta, Gamma, and Vega. If institutions wish to list TRY/JPY, they must create a separate event-driven module combining the central banks of Turkey, South Africa, and Mexico within their compliance system, requiring a one-time capital expenditure of HK$2.2 million per project and a 200% reserve for floating losses. This immediately causes the ROE model to fall below 5%, far below the 12% minimum capital return requirement for listed banks. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) also requires banks to set aside 1:1 risk provisions for non-OECD currency carry trades, effectively bringing capital occupation to the same level as unhedged spot trading. Based on this, HSBC and Bank of China (Hong Kong) have uniformly categorized TRY, ZAR, and MXN under the internal red line of "only offering direct pairs, not cross pairs," naturally resulting in no quotes being available at the retail level.
Looking at liquidity and operating costs: During the Hong Kong session, the 20-day average order book depth for TRY/JPY is less than $400,000, only 0.2% of USD/JPY, with a median spread of 42 pips, three times that of direct pairs. If brokers hedge through London or Johannesburg LPs, they need to pay an additional 15-18 pips liquidity premium. Adding the 5 pips local retail spread, the publicly available quotes seen by clients have expanded to over 60 pips, far exceeding the 1.2 pips for EUR/JPY, directly stifling trading interest. Back-office clearing also faces the risk of T+1 lira settlement. Hong Kong banks do not have CLS membership in Turkey and must act as agents through Deutsche Bank's Istanbul branch, incurring a daily cost of 15 basis points for funds to remain in the account. Over a year, this swallows up another 4% of the returns, compressing the already thin interest rate spread to zero.
Finally, let's look at the target customer base: 92% of the trading volume in Hong Kong's leveraged forex market comes from the three major direct currency pairs: USD/CNH, EUR/USD, and GBP/USD. Corporate hedging demand is concentrated in USD, EUR, and offshore RMB. Of the remaining 8% "long tail," half is used for USD/TRY and USD/ZAR direct currency pairs. The actual potential daily trading volume for TRY/JPY is less than US$2 million. Based on a 0.8-pip spread and 20x leverage, the annual gross profit would be HK$300,000, insufficient to cover the HK$2 million system construction cost and HK$500,000 annual maintenance fee. The business model is inherently unprofitable. As for institutional clients, sovereign wealth funds and hedge funds can directly obtain USD/TRY or USD/ZAR with better liquidity through CME futures or NDFs, and then use USD/JPY to complete Japanese yen LEs. The synthesis cost is 30% lower than the Hong Kong OTC market, so they have no incentive to trade TRY/JPY on local platforms.
Thus, under the combined influence of four forces—volatility eroding returns, regulation squeezing capital, liquidity increasing costs, and shrinking customer base demand—Hong Kong forex brokers and commercial banks have collectively fallen silent on TRY/JPY, ZAR/JPY, and MXN/JPY carry trades. It's not that they lack the technology, but rather that the calculations are too complex, the risks cannot be concealed, the regulatory burden is too heavy, and customers don't need them; ultimately, they can only remain permanently blank on their product lists.

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---